Overall Concern

The proposed amendments might affect the clarity and effectiveness of mental health assessments, especially regarding the inclusion of "gender identity or gender expression" in the criteria for determining mental illness or disorder.
 

Proposed Changes

The amendment adds a new point (d1) to Section 16(1) of the Mental Health Act 2007, stating that "expressing or not expressing a particular gender identity or gender expression" cannot be considered a sign of mental illness or disorder.
 

Vagueness and Subjectivity

• Concerns: The terms "gender identity" and "gender expression" are subjective and lack a universally accepted definition. This can lead to confusion and inconsistency in mental health assessments, undermining the objective criteria needed for evaluations. This ambiguity might make it harder to diagnose and treat individuals with genuine psychological issues unrelated to their gender identity or expression.

  • Example: A teenager distressed about their gender identity might also show signs of depression or anxiety. Excluding gender expression from indicators of mental illness could lead practitioners to overlook these other conditions.
     

Potential for Misdiagnosis

• Concerns: By stating that gender identity and expression are not indicators of mental illness, there's a risk of overlooking or dismissing underlying mental health conditions. Mental health professionals need the flexibility to explore all aspects of an individual’s mental health without restrictions that could lead to oversight or misdiagnosis.
   

  • Example: If a patient shows obsessive-compulsive traits centred around gender expression, prohibiting consideration of the drivers of their compulsions could prevent understanding and treating their obsessive-compulsive disorder.
     

Erosion of Professional Discretion

• Concerns: This amendment could limit the clinical judgment of psychiatrists and other mental health professionals by defining what can or cannot be considered in mental health assessments. This is particularly concerning in complex cases where gender dysphoria may accompany other psychological issues.

  • Example: Clinicians dealing with patients who have dissociative identity disorders with distinct stereotypical gender roles might be legally constrained from exploring how these aspects influence the patient’s overall mental health.
     

Impact on Safeguarding and Treatment

• Concerns: The amendment might complicate safeguarding processes designed to protect vulnerable individuals, especially minors, by limiting what mental health professionals can consider during assessments. This could lead to individuals not receiving appropriate care or intervention.

  • Example: In cases where minors suddenly change their gender identity possibly due to social media influence, professionals might hesitate to evaluate external pressures because of legal limitations imposed by the amendment.
     

Legal and Social Implications

• Concerns: Embedding specific ideologies about gender into mental health legislation can have broad legal and social implications. It risks politicising mental health care and could place mental health practitioners in difficult ethical and professional situations.
   

  • Example: Legislation specifying that gender expression cannot be considered a mental illness might cause health care providers to avoid necessary treatment discussions for fear of legal repercussions, even when such discussions are in the patient’s best interest.
     

Recommendation:

• Ensure that mental health assessments can consider all aspects without legislative restrictions related to gender identity.

• Comprehensive care and accurate diagnoses should not be obscured by gender identity claims.

• Withdraw the proposed amendments
   

Take Action Now

​