Overall Concerns: The proposed amendments could undermine the rights and safety of women and children, erode consent, and replace biological sex with gender identity in law—an unverifiable and ideologically driven change.
 

Redefinition of "Transgender" and Introduction of "Intersex" Section 3(1)

Proposed Changes: The amendment redefines "transgender person" and introduces "intersex person" definitions in Section 3(1).

Concerns:

• Misrepresentation of Biological Realities: The term "intersex" misrepresents Differences of Sex Development (DSDs), which are specific medical conditions, not evidence of a third sex. This could lead to confusion in situations where biological sex is important for safety and privacy.

• Erosion of Women’s Rights: The broad definitions could compromise women's rights to single-sex spaces and services based on biological sex. For example, allowing male-bodied individuals to be searched by female officers because they identify as female erodes the consent and dignity of both the officers and other women involved.
   

Modification of Language Regarding Sex - Section 3(2A)(a)

Proposed Changes: The language changes from "the opposite sex of" to "a different sex to" in Section 3(2A)(a).

Concerns:

• Dilution of Legal Clarity: This change introduces ambiguity and could allow for the erasure of biological sex recognition in law enforcement. It replaces factual, biological definitions with subjective identifications, undermining legal standards and protections designed around sex-based differences.
   

Compliance with Anti-Discrimination Norms - Section 5(4)

Proposed Changes: Ensures the Act does not limit the application of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 in Section 5(4).

Concerns:

• Legal Conflicts and Overreach: This could subordinate practical law enforcement needs to ideological positions on gender identity, compromising police work under the guise of non-discrimination.

Changes to Search Procedures - Section 32(6), (7), (7A)

Proposed Changes: Revises search procedures concerning the privacy and dignity of individuals being searched, detailed in Section 32, particularly in subsections (6), (7), and (7A).

Concerns:

• Safety and Privacy of Women: Allowing individuals to be searched based on gender identity rather than biological sex threatens the safety, dignity, and consent of women—both as officers and as individuals being searched. It forces women to accept close physical proximity with biological males in vulnerable situations under state authority.

• Risk to Children: Modifying search protocols without stringent safeguards based on biological realities exposes children to potential harm and confusion, particularly in sensitive situations involving searches.

Rules for Conduct of Strip Searches - Section 33(1)(b), (2), and (7)

Proposed Changes: Changes to the guidelines for conducting strip searches to accommodate gender identity preferences, specified in Section 33, particularly in subsections (1)(b), (2), and (7).

Concerns:

• Erosion of Consent and Privacy: Allowing strip searches based on gender identity rather than biological sex poses severe risks to personal privacy and violates the principle of consent, particularly affecting women and children who may be searched by or need to search someone of the opposite biological sex.

Section 44

Proposed Changes: The amendment to Section 44(3) allows individuals to be searched by a person of the same sex, or, in cases involving individuals identifying as intersex or transgender, by a person of a sex class they prefer, if available.

Concerns:

• Operational Integrity and Safety: This change undermines the clear and necessary distinctions based on biological sex that are essential for maintaining safety, privacy, and dignity of both search subjects and law enforcement personnel. It prioritizes subjective identity perceptions over biological realities, which could lead to practical challenges in enforcement and unwanted invasions of personal privacy. It places female officers in vulnerable positions, having to perform intimate searches on biological males who identify as female, and vice versa, increasing discomfort and risking safety.

Recommendation:
 

• Law enforcement procedures, particularly searches, should respect, recognise and prioritise the biological sex of individuals to safeguard privacy and security.

• Withdraw the proposed amendments

​

Take Action Now